Rick:

Another comment for your web site:

In April 2007, the City Commission vowed to protect the city’s water supply by not leasing any new lots around the Shawnee Twin Lakes. The rationale was that increased growth raises the risk of affecting the water.

On September 8, the City Commission could vote to cancel the city’s lease for 360 acres of School Trust Land on the lake. If this happens, the School Land Trust would have the option to lease more lots on a 3-year non-renewable lease. Using lots currently platted, they could almost double the number of developed properties in that area of the lake.

Current homeowners on the lake have substantial investments in their properties and protecting those means protecting the water. In contrast, lease terms proposed by the School Land Trust are more likely to attract a transient population looking for a temporary spot to park a recreational vehicle or trailer. With little to lose, where is the incentive for these people to care about your water or the long-term impact their lifestyle may have on it?

Lower water quality could translate to increased costs for chemicals and treatment, not to mention the impact on the environment and recreation. At a time when substantial rate increases have already been proposed to fund infrastructure improvements is not the time to take unnecessary risks with your water.

If you are concerned about the impact future growth around the lake could have on your water supply, contact your elected officials before September 8 and encourage them to retain control of the lake by renewing their lease for the 360 acres of School Trust Land.

Linda

420-2135